Bellwethr Seed Stage

Pitch Deck Collection

Back To The Collection
Bellwethr Pitch Deck to Raise a $2.5m Seed

This is the Bellwethr Pitch Deck used to raise a $2.5m seed round from Royal Street Ventures. This deal was announced on Jun 7, 2019.

About

Bellwethr utilizes autonomous operating systems for roles throughout subscription-based businesses. Bellwethr started around the idea that machine learning and AI should be available to anyone, no matter their technical background. The business was founded in 2017 by Matt Moody, with the sole intention of making artificial intelligence simple enough for anyone to utilize it.

Matt Moody, the founder of Kansas City-based SaaS startup Bellwethr, began toying with the idea of automating a customer lifecycle a couple of years ago. He was blown away by the power of machine learning and what it might accomplish for businesses and their customers.

Machine learning is a method of data analysis that automates analytical model building. Sas Institute, a leader in the online analytics space, describes it as “a branch of artificial intelligence based on the idea that systems can learn from data, identify patterns, and make decisions with minimal human intervention.”

These systems account for the suggested items you see while shopping on Amazon, the recommended programs offered on
Netflix, and the calls or texts that go out from credit card companies alerting customers on potential suspicious activity.

In a recent interview with Business Insider, Moody shared that he thinks machine learning is one of the most powerful innovations in human history, “Every innovation up to this point has been physical, but machine learning is the first cognitive innovation,” he said.

Working with many types of businesses over the years, Moody knew that naturally customers would come and go in the lifespan of the business, but he wondered if there was a way to automate red flags to know when that might happen. He thought if he could help his clients predict this, it could help them maintain their best customers longer.

Iterating on the product to prevent churn

The first versions of what is now the Bellwethr platform noted indicators of potential customer dissatisfaction, such as calls to customer service and late payments, then predicted how likely the customer would remain a customer and for how long based on large numbers of subscriber data.

After he’d built out this early model and was seeing accurate predictions for customer turnover, Moody was asked to present at a machine learning conference in Berlin. In the audience was a research scientist who was also involved with the Kansas City chapter of Techstars, a startup accelerator that happened to be in Bellwethr’s backyard.

It was during a pitch to VCs that Moody was presenting while participating in Techstars that one of the mentors actually said, “Now what?” At that time, the software was a predictive churn model only, so when asked what the clients do with that data, Moody had to say, “I don’t know.” The next question identified the potential churn of Bellwethr’s own clients when the VC asked, “What if clients don’t do anything?” Moody had to respond with, “Then I guess they’ll run out of customers eventually and they won’t be our clients for very long.”

Techstars Demo Day 2018

This feedback took Moody back to the drawing board. It was helpful for his clients to know what kind of turnover to expect from their customers and to be able to tell them what those warning signs were, but it needed to offer some solutions to truly be valuable.

The next iteration of Bellwethr was the “Retention Engine,” which flags warning factors but then allows actions to be assigned to counter the expected churn. These actions could be to send a specific sequence of emails to customers that were nearing the danger zone, answer frequently asked questions, or otherwise address issues that had people canceling their service. Then, a milestone would be entered in (such as, “Is this customer still a customer three months from now?”) and would indicate whether the action was successful or not, and at what rate. Additional actions could also be loaded in and tested to see if something else was more effective, such as a mailed letter or set of postcards or a gift of some kind.

Advancements to the Bellwethr software were then added that included options to “win back” the customers, noting which tactics were most successful and with which types of customers. This allowed for not only a/b testing (for example, “Would the series of emails work or would the mailed letter work?”) but for a/infinity testing.

Now, the software is able to not only predict the customers at risk of cancelling but allows the company to deploy methods within the same platform to keep them. By not only recognizing the warning signs but also testing win-back strategies, Bellwethr could address initial VCs’ concerns and help its clients keep customers longer.

Today, Moody said Bellwethr clients can see a reduction of churn by 27% almost immediately, which results in huge numbers of customers — and dollars — staying with the client.

Scaling Bellwethr with a cofounder and VCs

After speaking at the Berlin conference and meeting the first VCs he’d come in contact with, Moody decided that he wanted to grow the business bigger and more quickly than he’d be able to on his own. Courting VCs was a prime way to do it.

In researching what VCs were looking to invest in, Moody learned they’re unlikely to invest in a solo founder. He extended an offer to someone.

ne he thought was perfect for the role of cofounder, Daron Jamison. Moody knew Jamison shared the same vision and knew the aspects of the business probably better than anyone else — Daron had actually been an early Bellwethr client while on the leadership team of another company.

Going through KC Techstars in 2018 was one of the first orders of business for the newly partnered founders. Jamison’s skill set in finance and business operations complemented Moody’s product development and sales strengths. It was these abilities, Moody said, that actually seemed to be the thing that VCs honed in on during pitches. While the Bellwethr pitch deck always detailed goals and results, Moody said that what seemed to seal the deal was that Bellwethr had experienced founders.

“This wasn’t my first rodeo,” he explained. “They liked that I had developed and sold products before. That, and our personal abilities, seemed to be the thing they were betting on.”

Evolving the business (and the pitch deck)

Just as the Bellwethr software continuously learned and evolved, so did Moody and Jamison. Moody said every pitch deck they created became obsolete almost immediately. They developed better analogies to communicate the software’s capabilities, and graphics that mapped the process and focused on whatever core metric they could at the time. They saw each presentation as an opportunity to learn what made sense to their audience and what didn’t, no matter the audience.

Initial versions of the pitch deck focused on how the predictive model worked and how accurate it was. Later versions built in the solution mechanisms that had been added to the software — with that flashing 27% reduced churn rate that had VCs taking notice.

Now what? What’s next for Bellwethr? For machine learning — and Bellwethr — the possibilities are endless. Moody envisions Bellwethr solving problems and creating solutions for many years to come, for many types of businesses, and is looking forward to the challenge.

Source: Business Insider and Crunchbase

Raises

Announced Date  Transaction Name  Number of Investors  Money Raised  Lead Investors
Dec 17, 2020 Non Equity Assistance – Bellwethr 1 — —
Nov 30, 2020 Venture Round – Bellwethr — $500K —
Jun 7, 2019 Seed Round – Bellwethr 7 $2.5M Royal Street Ventures
Jul 16, 2018 Pre Seed Round – Bellwethr 2 — Techstars Kansas City Accelerator

Pitch Deck Review Summary

There is the potential for a half-decent deck here. The problem is that founders don’t get taught how to do slides properly- it’s a structuring thing.

The deck would be fine if it was designed to be talked to. But your deck has to live on its own, in isolation in case another partner at the fund wants a look.

The deck looks nice, but the content often lets them down with a general lack of context and explanation. I don’t get any wow factor. A slide to show the results clients get would resonate with me.

Structured Summary Review

Words

Only one slide has too much text. Almost every other slide does not have enough content. This is clearly very negative.

Slide length

There are 22 slides. This is in the sweet spot, however, there are clearly the execution slides missing, in which case my bet the original deck was more in the 32 slide range.

Headers

The headers are lame. They just make sort of statements like a checklist. Great headers are how you tell a story- the narrative.

Appearance

It’s nice enough. You don’t need much more.

Narrative

The slide order appears to be roughly correct. You can only have a narrative if you have proper headers.

Structure

Most of the slides are structured well and there is an ok use of negative space. They sometimes get a little messy.

Slides

About half the deck hasn’t been shared.

Bellwethr Pitch Deck

I would make the logo a lot more prominent on the cover page.

The tagline could be a little more specific.

Start out your deck explaining what you do simply, then with the industry to provide context.

The header text should be 25% smaller and on one line.

The body text should be larger.

Weak slide. The four bars are not an alternative to a chart with like, real data. Yes, it is more work, but it is value added.

 

Weak title and rubbish content. Prove the three points with stats.

What does this slide tell you? I’m not sure.

Make a point, not a vague statement. Quotes are lame proof. Use as a last resort.

Quotes again and a lame header. Tell me the point!

Quotes again and a lame header. Tell me the point!

Lame header. Prove with data.

Inconsistent slide structure. Lazy content.

Huh? What’s the point?

Better, but a bit wordy. Are the images linked to the text?

They explained the cancellation process. No bad.

Could be a good slide, but I don’t get it.

Again solid slide, but needs to be explained better.

Should have images for each step. The slide is weak.

Ok smart, but there needs to be some context to get my head around how this links together.

As above. The slide is just not that interesting.

Ok, no header at all. What the heck?

Header…

Header…

Lame.

Deck Collection

See the rest of the collection here:

BACK TO THE DECK COLLECTION

    Get in the game

    Free tools and resources like this shipped to you as they happen.

    Comments (0)

    There are no comments yet :(

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Leave a Reply

      Join Our Newsletter

      Get new posts delivered to your inbox
      0